subrogated उदाहरण वाक्य

उदाहरण वाक्य

1. Nevertheless both courts ultimately treated the question at stake as being whether BFC is entitled to be subrogated to the rights of RTB . On the present appeal counsel adopted a similar approach.
2. Bacchus received $ 733, 442.90 compensation from petitioner Vimar Seguros y Reaseguros ( Vimar Seguros ), Bacchus'marine cargo insurer that became subrogated pro tanto to Bacchus'rights.
3. The House of Z��iga received two grandees, one for the duke of B�jar and another for the count of Miranda del Casta�ar, subrogated later on to the duke of Pe�aranda de Duero.
4. Mortgage Express claimed to be subrogated, amongst other things, to the rights of the Midland Bank against Mrs Filby to the extent that the joint debt to them had been discharged with their money.
5. In some states, PIP is subrogatable, meaning that your insurance carrier will pay for your loss, regardless of liability, and then recover ( or subrogate ) what it paid from the liable party's insurance carrier.
6. The " Wage Earner Protection Program Act " provides a procedure to claim a portion of the amount due, against which the " super-priority " of the employees on the assets of the estate is subrogated.
7. Where a bank, acting on what it believes erroneously to be the valid mandate of its client, pays money to a third party which discharges the customer's liability to the third party, the bank is subrogated to the third party's former remedies against the customer.
8. Where a lender lends money to a borrower to discharge the borrower's debt to a third party ( or which the lender pays directly to the third party to discharge the debt ), the lender may be entitled to be subrogated to the third party's former rights against the borrower to the extent of the debt discharged.
9. Conceptually, fraudulent trading is similar to a fraudulent conveyance, but the key distinction is that an application to have a transaction set aside as a fraudulent conveyance usually requires to the third party beneficiary to disgorge the benefit of the conveyance to undo the loss to the company's assets, whereas a court order in relation to fraudulent trading it is the responsible parties ( usually the subrogated to any claim that the company might have with respect to a fraudulent conveyance.
10. He says it is the only, or at any rate, the most cogent, evidence of what the relevant transaction was, and he says :  There we have the bank and D . H . N . solemnly declaring and agreeing that what happened was that the bank lent the money to Bronze to enable it to purchase for its own benefit; that the relationship between the bank and Bronze was simply that of creditor and debtor; and when D . H . N . paid off the Bronze liability of ?16, 400 odd, that was either a voluntary payment, which gave it no rights  but that did not matter because it also bought all the shares  or was a payment which subrogated D . H . N . to the bank's rights against Bronze as a creditor .  If this was an action on that agreement, there might well be an estoppel, but it is not, and I do not see anything to prevent D . H . N . asserting, and this court accepting, if it be satisfied, that the agreement of February 8, 1966, and the letter of December 17, 1965, both misstated the position.