unsatisfactoriness वाक्य

It would not be hard to find a few cites supporting some recent some controversial view, and what's more your cites don't back it up anyway-your Harvey cite is to a discussion of one of the twelve niddhanas, and he presents the four noble truths as a path to cessation of suffering and unsatisfactoriness like everyone else.
The main larger question was, whether the third truth should be phrased as a path to cessation of suffering / unsatisfactoriness as Buddha himself expressed it according to the Pali canon, or expressed as a " way to end this cycle "-and I also touched on whether the historical section should mention the views of Gombrich, Harvey, Wynne, Payutto, etc etc according to which most of the Pali Canon expresses the teachings of a single teacher, the Buddha.
In Buddhism-related English literature, " Anatt " is rendered as " not-Self ", but this translation expresses an incomplete meaning, states Peter Harvey; a more complete rendering is " non-Self " because from its earliest days, " Anatt " doctrine denies that there is anything called a'Self'in any person or anything else, and that a belief in'Self'is a source of " Dukkha " ( suffering, pain, unsatisfactoriness ).