eudaimonia वाक्य

According to Aristotle, eudaimonia actually requires activity, action, so that it is not sufficient for a person to possess a squandered ability or disposition.
In some modern texts therefore, the other alternative is to leave the term in an English form of the original Greek, as " eudaimonia ".
Eudaimonia depends on all the things that would make us happy if we knew of their existence, but quite independently of whether we do know about them.
The highest aims are living well and " eudaimonia " a Greek word often translated as well-being, happiness or " human flourishing ".
Drawing on the Stoic concept of Eudaimonia, he says one can think of a god more akin to a wise sage than the loving parent that Schellenberg envisions.

Note that " eudaimonia ", the term we translate as " happiness ", is for Aristotle an activity rather than an emotion or a state.
However, Socrates adopted a quite radical form of eudaimonism ( see above ) : he seems to have thought that virtue is both necessary and sufficient for eudaimonia.
So eudaimonia corresponds to the idea of having an objectively good or desirable life, to some extent independently of whether one knows that certain things exist or not.
Therefore, things such as wealth, intelligence, and courage are valued only in relation to other things, while eudaimonia is the only thing valuable in isolation.
Aristotle takes virtue and its exercise to be the most important constituent in eudaimonia but acknowledges also the importance of external goods such as health, wealth, and beauty.