| संज्ञा • व्यावहारिक राजनीति |
realpolitik मीनिंग इन हिंदी
realpolitik उदाहरण वाक्य
उदाहरण वाक्य
- Larger than his party , Vajpayee has that image of not being subordinated to realpolitik .
वाजपेयी की छवि एक ऐसे नेता की रही है जो राजनैतिक विवशताओं का कैदी नहीं रहा . - Even while a new realpolitik of cooperation with the Americans seems to be asserting itself , there is a danger that the US-led military action against Afghanistan may lead to a revival of the tendencies that have often played havoc with India 's foreign policy in the past : habitual dissent , anti-Americanism , fastidious legalism and antediluvian ideologies .
अफगानिस्तान के खिलफ अमेरिकी सैनिक कार्रवाई से वे प्रवृइत्तयां फिर उभर सकती हैं , जो भारतीय विदेश नीति के लिए अतीत में घातक रही हैं-स्वभावगत असहमति , अमेरिकावाद का विरोध और दकियानूसी सिद्धांत . - Democracy : Harkening back to the good old days of “20 or 30 years ago” does contain a real message, however, as Fouad Ajami points out. This phrasing signals “a return to Realpolitik and business-as-usual” in relations with the Muslim world. Bush's “freedom agenda” has been in retreat for over for three years ; now, with Obama, tyrants can breathe yet more easily. Finally, there is the issue of Obama's personal connection to Islam. During the campaign, he denounced discussion of his connections to Islam as “ fear-mongering ,” and those exploring this subject found themselves vilified . He so severely discouraged use of his middle name, Hussein , that John McCain apologized when a warm-up speaker at a campaign event dared mention “Barack Hussein Obama.” After the election, the rules changed dramatically, with the oath of office administered to “Barack Hussein Obama” and the new president volunteering , “I have Muslim members of my family, I have lived in Muslim countries.”
लोकतंत्र- 20-30 साल पहले के अच्छे रिश्ते का ढोल पीटकर ओबामा एक खास संदेश देने के लिए मेहनत कर रहे हैं। ओबामा की इस कोशिश को फौद आजमी के शब्दों में और भी बेहतर समझा जा सकता है- 'ओबामा मुस्लिम देशों के साथ व्यावहारिक राजनीति के जरिए रोजमर्रा के धंधे निपटाना चाहते हैं।' मतलब साफ है- पहले जॉर्ज बुश के कार्यकाल में स्वतंत्रता के एजेंडा के नाम पर कट्टरवादी ताकतों ने 3 साल चैन की बंसी बजाई और अब ओबामा के कार्यकाल में इन कट्टरवादी ताकतों की तो जैसे लॉटरी निकल आई है, बेशक अब वो जश्न मना सकते हैं। - Apr. 11, 2013 addenda : Some reflections that did not fit the main article: (1) Before this article appeared, I gave a several interviews ( here , here and here ) advocating tactical support for the Assad regime; these prompted name-calling by CAIR and some hysterical reactions about me urging genocide in Syria. No: I look forward to the day when Syria is at peace with itself and a good neighbor, when its government is democratic and law-abiding. But until that distant time, I prefer that evil forces direct their attentions against each other than against the outside world. (2) To the argument that early Western support for the rebels would have prevented the Islamists from dominating them ( which they now do ), I reply that Western powers did provide early support to rebels in Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt and look what that achieved - Islamists dominate all three of those countries. The same would likely have been the case in Syria. Western assistance is not that influential in altering the course of an ideological movement. (3) I dislike advocating support for Assad and respect the intentions of those who share my goals but disagree with my means. I do, however, see them engaging in wishful, non-strategic thinking. (4) That my approach gives priority to strategic considerations marks it, in the context of modern Western politics, as conservative. Liberals enjoy a confidence in their own wellbeing that conservatives lack. Where liberals tend to worry about others (snail darters), conservatives tend to worry about themselves (a sufficient electricity supply). Consistent with this temperamental difference, the former focus on civilian welfare in Syria and the latter on Western security. (5) My advice is hardly original to me but is old-fashioned Realpolitik. Put differently, it fits into a divide-and-rule tradition that goes back to the Romans. (6) Assad's staying in power has the advantage that the regime's chemical weapons are less dangerous than if he fell.
इस भावना के अनुरूप मेरा तर्क है कि अमेरिका को हारते हुए पक्ष की सहायता करनी चाहिये और वह कोई भी क्यों न हो, जैसा कि मई 1987 के विश्लेषण में मैंने कहा था, “ 1980 में जब इराक ने ईरान को धमकी दी थी तो हमारा हित कुछ मात्रा में ईरान के साथ था। परंतु 1982 की गर्मियों से इराक रक्षात्मक हो गया और अब वाशिंगटन पूरी तरह इसके साथ है..... भविष्य की ओर यदि देखें तो क्या इराक एक बार पुनः आक्रामक हो सकेगा वैसे तो यह सम्भव नहीं दिखता परंतु असम्भव भी नहीं है, अमेरिका को फिर से युद्ध में आना चाहिये और ईरान को सहायता करने के सम्बंध में सोचना चाहिये” ।
परिभाषा
संज्ञा.- politics based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations
पर्याय: practical politics