policy of appeasement वाक्य

उदाहरण वाक्य

1. His pessimism comes to mind whenever a republic makes a terrible mistake, from the French policy of appeasement toward Germany in the 1930s to the American policy of incrementalism in Vietnam to the South Korean “sunshine policy” now under way.
   उनका यह निराशावाद मस्तिष्क में तब - तब कौंधता है जब कोई गणतन्त्र भयानक भूल करता है चाहे 1930 में जर्मनी के प्रति फ्रांस की तुष्टीकरण की नीति हो,वियतनाम में अमेरिका की वेतन बढाने की हो या फिर वर्तमान समय में दक्षिण कोरिया द्वारा चलाई जा रही सूर्योदय नीति हो ।
2. Fishman's answer revisits World War I, which is not a surprise, as post-cold war analysts increasingly recognize the extent to which Europe lives still under the shadow of that disaster, whether in its renewed policy of appeasement or its attitudes towards its own culture . Back then, the British government first exploited advances in mass media and advertising to target both the enemy's and its own civilian populations, hoping to shape their thinking.
   फिर प्रथम विश्व युद्ध के दिनों में आते है जब सर्वप्रथम ब्रिटिश सरकार ने जन मीडिया की सम्भावनाओं की ओर कदम बढ़ाया और शत्रु तथा अपनी जनता के विचारों को नया आकार देने की आशा के साथ विज्ञापन का सहारा लिया।
3. If the hostages are released, the policy of appeasement at home and abroad will seemingly have been vindicated. But at what a price! As Tony Parkinson writes in Melbourne's Age newspaper, “No democracy should have to jump through these hoops to keep innocent people alive.” And jumping those hoops has deep implications.
   यदि अपहृत व्यक्ति मुक्त हो जाते हैं तो तुष्टीकरण की यह नीति फ्रांस में तथा विदेशों में पुष्ट हो जायेगी. परन्तु किस कीमत पर. जैसा कि मेलबोर्न एज समाचार पत्र में टोनी पारकिन्सन ने लिखा है “ किसी भी लोकतन्त्र को निर्दोष लोगों की जान बचाने के लिये ऐसे रास्तों से नहीं गुजरना चाहिये”.
4. Since 1992, Israel's hapless leaders have followed a policy of appeasement in the hopes that “timely concessions to disgruntled nations whose grievances had some legitimacy [would succeed in] … defusing difficulties and promoting peace and goodwill.” But, in a perpetually relevant comment dating to the dark days of 1940, Winston Churchill warned that “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.” The U.N. crocodile has shown it is satiated but briefly by Israel, returning after each “ painful concession ” with an even more voracious appetite. Will Israelis ever again understand that wars are won through victory, not retreat?
   तो क्या शेरोन द्वारा इजरायल की राजनीति को एकदम वामपंथ की ओर मोड़ देने से व्यक्तिगत आक्षेप का दौर समाप्त हो जाएगा . ? शांति के लिए अमेरिका के साथ मेल-जोल , इजरायल पॉलिसी फोरम् और जैक शिरॉक ने संयुक्त राष्ट्रसंघ के साथ इस सुखद अवसर का मार्ग प्रशस्त किया है .
5. Summing up, the policy of appeasement goes back a century and a half, enjoyed some success, and ever remains alive. But with ideological enemies it must consciously be resisted, lest the tragic lessons of the 1930s, 1970s, and 1990s be ignored. And repeated. Sep. 25, 2008 update : This is one in a series of analyses I have written on the renewed respectability of appeasement as a tool of foreign policy: “ Appease Iran? ” The Jerusalem Post , September 25, 2008. The “perfectly respectable” policy of appeasement is back in vogue. Related Topics: History , Iran , US policy receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item
   समापन करते हुए कहा जा सकता है कि तुष्टीकरण की नीति डेढ सौ वर्ष पहले से चली आ रही है जिसे कि कुछ सफलता भी मिली है और आज भी यह जीवित है। परंतु विचारधारागत शत्रुओं के मामले में जानबूझकर इसका विरोध होना चाहिये जितना ही 1930 के दशक ,1970 के दशक तथा 1990 के दशक की अवहेलना की जायेगी उतना ही इसे फिर से दुहराया जायेगा।
6. Summing up, the policy of appeasement goes back a century and a half, enjoyed some success, and ever remains alive. But with ideological enemies it must consciously be resisted, lest the tragic lessons of the 1930s, 1970s, and 1990s be ignored. And repeated. Sep. 25, 2008 update : This is one in a series of analyses I have written on the renewed respectability of appeasement as a tool of foreign policy: “ Appease Iran? ” The Jerusalem Post , September 25, 2008. The “perfectly respectable” policy of appeasement is back in vogue. Related Topics: History , Iran , US policy receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item
   समापन करते हुए कहा जा सकता है कि तुष्टीकरण की नीति डेढ सौ वर्ष पहले से चली आ रही है जिसे कि कुछ सफलता भी मिली है और आज भी यह जीवित है। परंतु विचारधारागत शत्रुओं के मामले में जानबूझकर इसका विरोध होना चाहिये जितना ही 1930 के दशक ,1970 के दशक तथा 1990 के दशक की अवहेलना की जायेगी उतना ही इसे फिर से दुहराया जायेगा।